AFSCME criticizes end of $15 wage and anti-union policy shift

The federal government's recent policy shift regarding the minimum wage for federal contractors and its infrastructure investment strategy has sparked considerable debate. The decision to end the $15 minimum wage for these workers, while also channeling federal infrastructure funds towards companies that oppose unions, has drawn significant criticism from labor leaders.

Policy Changes Stir Controversy

AFSCME President Lee Saunders voiced strong opposition to these new directives from the White House. His statement reflects deep concern over the implications for workers' rights and economic conditions. By removing the minimum wage floor for federal contractors and supporting anti-union firms with federal investments, critics argue that the government is prioritizing corporate interests over the welfare of employees.

In a statement, Saunders remarked, “The billionaires in the White House continue to find new ways to enrich themselves at the expense of working people. Ending the $15 minimum wage for federal contractors and redirecting taxpayer money to anti-union companies is just the latest example.” He emphasized the potential consequences of these policies, suggesting they are intended to limit workers' earnings and diminish their ability to advocate for better working conditions.

These actions, according to critics like Saunders, represent a broader pattern of anti-worker policies. They argue that such measures not only break promises made to workers about improving economic conditions but also hinder efforts to address workplace safety and fairness concerns.