Unions and Allies Sue Trump-Vance Over $10 Billion Child Care Cuts

The Facts -

Legal Challenge Arises Over $10 Billion Funding Freeze Affecting Key States

In a move that sets the stage for a high-stakes legal battle, major unions and a business advocacy group have banded together to contest the Trump-Vance administration's controversial decision to freeze over $10 billion in funding. This financial halt impacts child care and family assistance programs across California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, leading to accusations of political retaliation.

San Francisco, Calif. – Representing a coalition including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and Main Street Alliance, legal organizations Democracy Forward and Beeson, Tayer & Bodine are spearheading the lawsuit. The plaintiffs argue that the January 6, 2026 freeze violates the Administrative Procedure Act by bypassing required procedures and targeting states for partisan reasons. Furthermore, they claim the administration is infringing on First Amendment rights by suppressing free speech among the organization's members.

The freeze is expected to disproportionately impact vulnerable communities, especially low-income households, single-parent families, and children, raising significant concerns about the administration's motives. Nancy Harvey, a licensed family child care provider in Oakland, California, emphasized, “Defunding child care is a clear attack on working families and child care providers like me. But forcing me to close my doors would do more than put me out of business – it would hurt the kids I love building educational foundations with and the parents who rely on me to get to work every day.”

AFSCME President Lee Saunders emphasized that this move undermines fundamental services, asserting, “Child care providers ensure that parents can go to work and kids can thrive... We are filing this lawsuit to hold the administration accountable and ensure that essential funding for our communities cannot be withheld simply for political retaliation.”

Richard Trent, Executive Director of Main Street Alliance, highlighted the ripple effect on local economies, stating, “When this funding is frozen, our employees can’t find or afford care, parents are forced to cut hours or leave jobs, and local businesses lose the stable workforce they depend on.”

Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, criticized the administration's actions as part of a "retribution agenda," urging Americans to consider the broader implications of targeting child care providers. She noted, “Our clients and the families they serve will suffer if these clearly unlawful funding cuts are allowed to continue.”

The lawsuit, AFSCME v HHS, addresses a broader concern that the Trump-Vance administration is using federal grants as a political tool, particularly against states with Democratic leadership. Officials have cited vague allegations of "fraud" to justify the funding halt, a tactic allegedly acknowledged by the administration as a punitive measure against "blue states."

The legal team from Democracy Forward includes Yenisey Rodríguez, Kevin E. Friedl, Shiva Kooragayala, Cortney Robinson Henderson, Joel McElvain, and Robin F. Thurston. Interested parties can view the official filing here.

---
Read More USA Works News