Judge Halts Trump's Mass Firing Plan Amidst Government Shutdown

The Facts -

Federal Judge Halts Trump Administration's Mass Layoffs Amid Shutdown

A U.S. federal judge issued an injunction against the Trump administration, temporarily blocking mass layoffs of federal employees triggered during the government shutdown. The decision comes after two major labor unions legally contested the administration's approach.

In a landmark ruling, Judge Susan Illston from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California declared that the unions, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), are likely to prove their claims. They argue that the administration's reduction-in-force (RIF) notices, affecting over 4,000 federal workers, are unlawful and arbitrary. Judge Illston's order prohibits further issuance or enforcement of these RIF notices while demanding detailed information on already issued notices within two days.

The legal challenge, initiated by AFGE and AFSCME on September 30, accuses the administration of overstepping its bounds. The lawsuit alleges that the Office of Management and Budget, led by Russ Vought, along with the Office of Personnel Management and its Director Scott Kupor, authorized illegal directives for mass layoffs during the shutdown. This action breaks from the traditional procedures where federal employees are either furloughed or deemed "excepted" and required to work without pay until a resolution is reached. On October 4, the unions sought a temporary restraining order to prevent these terminations, escalating their efforts as layoffs commenced on October 10.

Legal representation for AFGE and AFSCME comes from Altshuler Berzon LLP, Democracy Forward, and the Democracy Defenders Fund. The unions contend that the administration's actions punish federal employees and misuse the shutdown for political leverage, disregarding the statutory protections of workers.

"This decision affirms that these threatened mass firings are likely illegal and blocks layoff notices from going out," stated AFSCME President Lee Saunders. He emphasized the detrimental impact on federal workers, highlighting the administration's disregard for their roles. AFGE National President Everett Kelley also criticized the administration's actions as both cruel and unlawful during a government shutdown.

Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, criticized the administration's actions as part of a broader strategy to divert attention from its policies. "Our civil servants do the work of the people, and playing games with their livelihoods is cruel and unlawful and a threat to everyone in our nation," Perryman asserted.

Norm Eisen, Executive Chair of Democracy Defenders Fund, called the court's decision a significant victory for federal workers and the public who rely on government services. He urged an end to the shutdown and demanded fair treatment for public servants.

According to Danielle Leonard of Altshuler Berzon LLP, the administration's instructions unlawfully compel federal workers to act against their colleagues. "Today's order is the first step in the unions’ fight for justice for the employees that the president and OMB unfortunately insist on using as pawns," she stated.

The lawsuit underscores the administration's deviation from established norms, accusing it of leveraging the shutdown to strip employees of their rights and pressuring Congress. This approach, the unions argue, violates the fundamental laws governing government shutdowns, highlighting the need for judicial intervention to uphold the rights and dignity of federal employees.

---
Read More USA Works News