Analysis Highlights AGOA's Impact on Trade Dynamics and Policy Challenges

The Facts -

  • AGOA benefits extractive industries, not industrial development, aiding China.
  • Eligibility criteria enforcement is inconsistent, ignoring rights and governance.
  • Waivers allow Chinese-linked goods in, undermining U.S. and African economies.


Recent findings from the CPA highlight a significant imbalance in the benefits of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), favoring extractive industries over comprehensive industrial development. Concurrently, China has significantly outpaced the United States in its trade volume with AGOA nations. This shift bolsters global supply chains that enhance China's influence across Africa. The CPA critiques the extension of AGOA, noting its repercussions on American manufacturers and laborers involved in exporting industrial goods from Africa, and calls for a reevaluation of trade policies to better foster domestic growth and international cooperation.

Concerns have also been raised by the CPA regarding the inconsistent enforcement of AGOA's eligibility criteria, which include mandates for human rights and governance. Such inconsistency has allowed countries with questionable records to maintain their preferential status. For instance, Nigeria continues to qualify despite ongoing issues with security force misconduct and governance problems. Similarly, South Africa benefits from AGOA despite significant political corruption and the erosion of democratic frameworks.

The CPA also highlights that AGOA's country-of-origin waivers have diluted the program's developmental objectives. These waivers permit products predominantly made with inputs from third countries to be imported into the U.S. without duties. This loophole has permitted apparel and other industries relying on Chinese materials, but assembled in AGOA nations, to gain preferential access with minimal African value addition. This dynamic reduces local supply chain development incentives, whilst exposing U.S. manufacturers to competition from supply chains linked to China.

Proponents of AGOA argue that its continuation will bolster economic expansion in sub-Saharan Africa, aid in diversifying supply chains, and provide a counterbalance to China's growing presence in the region. However, the reality is that China's trade and infrastructure investments across Africa have increased considerably over recent years.

---
Read More USA Works News