Trump's Climate Orders Spark Catholic Concerns Amid Environmental Debate
Editorial StaffThe Facts -
- Trump signed more executive orders in 10 days than past presidents in 100.
- Critics argue Trump's actions threaten environment and U.S.'s global credibility.
- Despite federal changes, clean energy growth remains supported by market forces.
The pace of executive orders from President Donald Trump can be hard to follow, as he has signed more in his initial days than any recent president in their first 100 days. Among these are significant measures affecting the environment, including the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the suspension of funds from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.
These executive orders have provoked concern among environmentally-conscious Catholics. The Pew Research Center found that 75% of Catholics view global warming as a problem, with almost half seeing it as very serious. Anna Johnson from the Laudato Si’ Movement reflects this sentiment, warning that withdrawing from the Paris Agreement undermines U.S. credibility in addressing climate change.
Pope's Environmental Advocacy
Pope Francis has prioritized ecological issues, notably through his encyclicals “Laudato Si’” and “Laudate Deum.” He has emphasized the undeniable signs of climate change, such as extreme weather events, and urged for urgent action.
The United Nations has stressed the necessity of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 43% by 2030 to avoid severe climate change impacts. Despite being the hottest year on record, 2024 reflects a pattern of rising temperatures, raising alarms among environmentalists.
Former President Trump has expressed skepticism about climate change. He has previously referred to it as a “hoax” and questioned the severity of its impacts during a 2024 interview with Elon Musk.
Public Opinion on Climate Initiatives
A Yale University poll shows strong support (73%) among voters for U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement and a significant portion (54%) believe that addressing global warming should be a priority for the government. However, Trump's stance aligns closely with promoting fossil fuel production, as evidenced by his "energy emergency" declaration and the freezing of IRA funds.
This freeze affects numerous clean energy initiatives, including home energy programs and green job initiatives. Critics warn that it could increase energy costs and risk job losses in the clean energy sector. House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro criticized these actions, highlighting potential negative effects on household energy bills and employment.
The Future of Clean Energy
Despite federal policy shifts, experts like Keneth Sercy from the Niskanen Center remain optimistic about the resilience of clean energy growth. He notes that the momentum for cleaner energy will likely continue due to market forces, state policies, and technological advancements.
Judge Glock from the Manhattan Institute also observes that long-term projects funded by the IRA are likely to proceed, with state and local governments and private sectors investing in clean energy.
Yet, Anna Johnson warns of the broader implications of Trump's environmental policies, stressing their potential harm to both ecological efforts and the U.S.'s global standing.
---
Read More USA Works News
