AFSCME President criticizes House budget plan for cutting key services

In a significant political development, the House has passed a budget proposal that has sparked widespread debate over its potential impact on crucial social services like Medicaid and SNAP. The proposal has drawn strong reactions from various quarters, emphasizing the tension between tax policy and public welfare.

AFSCME President Lee Saunders voiced a critical perspective on the budget, stating, “This budget proves that anti-union extremists in Congress are more concerned with giving the wealthy trillions in tax cuts than helping working people." He highlighted the growing unrest among voters who have been actively participating in town halls, urging their representatives not to proceed with cuts to essential programs like Medicaid and SNAP.

Saunders expressed concern that the new budget plan could lead to millions losing access to healthcare, while also increasing food insecurity for many families. The plan’s potential long-term effects on Medicare and Social Security have also been a point of contention. “They want elected leaders who will lower rising costs on everything from rent to food,” Saunders noted, emphasizing the disconnect between voter demands and congressional actions.

Public service workers, represented by AFSCME, are reportedly stepping up their efforts to resist what they perceive as detrimental policy changes. From the healthcare sector to public safety and corrections, AFSCME members remain committed to their roles in strengthening communities. “Public service workers will continue to organize against these billionaire attacks,” Saunders affirmed, calling on Congress to reconsider the proposed cuts.