AFSCME President Condemns Trump Union-Busting Executive Order

Controversy Erupts Over Executive Order Affecting Federal Workers

In a move that has sparked significant debate, the Trump administration recently enacted an executive order that has drawn criticism for its potential impact on federal workers' rights. The order, labeled by some as a direct attack on collective bargaining, affects hundreds of thousands of federal employees, including many represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

AFSCME President Lee Saunders has publicly condemned the executive action, describing it as "blatant retribution" aimed at undermining the voices of federal workers. These employees are considered vital to the functioning of communities across the nation. Their roles include ensuring the safety of drinking water, supporting healthcare services for veterans, and administering critical programs like Medicaid and Social Security.

“President Trump’s attempt to unlawfully eliminate the right to collectively bargain for hundreds of thousands of federal workers is blatant retribution. Federal workers – including thousands of AFSCME members – are the lifeblood of their communities. They protect our clean drinking water and food supply, care for veterans, support American farmers, administer Medicaid and Social Security and so much more. This attack is meant to silence their voices, so Elon Musk and his minions can shred the services that working people depend on the federal government to do.”

Saunders also criticized the administration for its connections with wealthy interests, suggesting that this agenda is part of a broader scheme that benefits the ultra-rich at the expense of the average worker. He referred to the Project 2025 plan, a comprehensive document spanning 900 pages, which he claims aims to reduce workers' power while favoring billionaires' interests.

The AFSCME, which represents 1.4 million members, has pledged to resist these changes and fight for the rights of federal workers, aiming to maintain their ability to negotiate and have a say in their working conditions. The unfolding situation has prompted questions about the balance between government policy and workers' rights, adding to the ongoing dialogue about labor relations under the current administration.